1 |
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:50:26 +0200 |
2 |
Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Hi, |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Harley Peters <harley@×××××××××××××.net>: |
7 |
> > Because the numbers don't look so good for Gnash. |
8 |
> > bzr branch http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/r/gnash/trunk |
9 |
> |
10 |
> They look similar on my system to that of Emacs, although I have to |
11 |
> try with new revisions added. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> > Having said that it's only a two line change to the bzr.eclass code |
14 |
> > to get it to work the way I want. |
15 |
> > And I can live with that. :) |
16 |
> |
17 |
> But in the end I need to justify the changes not only for you. :) |
18 |
> |
19 |
> V-Li |
20 |
> |
21 |
|
22 |
I'm getting good numbers from the command line but in the ebuild it's |
23 |
much different. |
24 |
I haven't timed it but it takes about 25 minutes to do a full |
25 |
checkout and about a third that to do the light weight checkout. |
26 |
The update takes less than a minute with the full checkout. And it |
27 |
takes ten's of minutes with a lightweight checkout. |
28 |
|
29 |
Is there something else in the ebuild I need to specify besides |
30 |
EBZR_REPO_URI="http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/r/gnash/trunk" ? |
31 |
|
32 |
You can download the ebuild at: |
33 |
http://overlays.biterror.net/files/gnash-9999.ebuild |