Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Aaron W. Swenson" <titanofold@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 13:30:21
Message-Id: 4FBCE5EE.9070708@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by "Andreas K. Huettel"
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA256
3
4 On 05/23/2012 09:25 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
5 >
6 >>
7 >> Please discuss my arguments and come to the conclusions to
8 >> RESO/WONT-FIX "testing git-cvsserver", make a "clean cut" and
9 >> remove this bug from the blockers of "[TRACKER] portage migration
10 >> to git".
11 >>
12 >
13 > +1
14 >
15 > Please cut cvs support once and for all.
16 >
17 +1 for clean cut
18 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
19 Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
20 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
21
22 iF4EAREIAAYFAk+85e4ACgkQVxOqA9G7/aDWpgD/SYfC3aOlOP2kAwK3qt81smH8
23 YWs60Kl77Xx+wIM1jx8A/0PkisxPTsLE5jR59GhaDmC+epoodW1GOak//pAvCmCG
24 =F8Rw
25 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Fabio Erculiani <lxnay@g.o>