1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 05/17/2012 04:15 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
5 |
> On 05/17/2012 11:00 PM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote: |
6 |
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> On 05/17/2012 03:51 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
9 |
>>> any complaints ? -mike |
10 |
>>> |
11 |
>>> Index: profiles/base/packages |
12 |
>>> =================================================================== |
13 |
>>> |
14 |
>>> |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>>> |
17 |
RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/base/packages,v |
18 |
>>> retrieving revision 1.62 diff -u -p -r1.62 packages --- |
19 |
>>> profiles/base/packages 12 Mar 2012 09:13:37 -0000 1.62 |
20 |
>>> +++ profiles/base/packages 17 May 2012 19:50:49 -0000 @@ |
21 |
>>> -61,7 +61,7 @@ #*sys-devel/libtool #*sys-devel/m4 |
22 |
>>> *sys-devel/make -*sys-devel/patch +*>=sys-devel/patch-2.6.1 |
23 |
>>> *sys-fs/e2fsprogs *virtual/dev-manager *virtual/editor |
24 |
>> |
25 |
>> What's the advantage/reward? |
26 |
> |
27 |
> <patch-2.6.1 fails if patch contains DOS -line endings, like the |
28 |
> ones you get from some crappy pastebin services or Trac's |
29 |
> webservice |
30 |
> |
31 |
>> =patch-2.6.1 doesn't have this problem, and this is what |
32 |
>> developers are |
33 |
> using anyway |
34 |
> |
35 |
> so less breakage, no possibility of these things slipping by |
36 |
> |
37 |
> consistent behavior |
38 |
> |
39 |
> profit! |
40 |
> |
41 |
> - Samuli |
42 |
> |
43 |
|
44 |
I'm in! |
45 |
|
46 |
+1 |
47 |
|
48 |
- - Aaron |
49 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
50 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) |
51 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
52 |
|
53 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAk+1YbwACgkQVxOqA9G7/aCGtAD/TpWZt3OVe+3rvqupbJrd8hWu |
54 |
TMYOHCGLhqqaIb8B2AABAIaq5UsEciS9A9PYiE23rwDuWzfZQts+WX06Rugc7Rkk |
55 |
=QgUZ |
56 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |