Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Aaron W. Swenson" <titanofold@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] forcing recent patch-2.6.1 everywhere
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 20:40:08
Message-Id: 4FB561BC.30300@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] forcing recent patch-2.6.1 everywhere by Samuli Suominen
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA256
3
4 On 05/17/2012 04:15 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
5 > On 05/17/2012 11:00 PM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
6 >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
7 >>
8 >> On 05/17/2012 03:51 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
9 >>> any complaints ? -mike
10 >>>
11 >>> Index: profiles/base/packages
12 >>> ===================================================================
13 >>>
14 >>>
15 >>
16 >>>
17 RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/base/packages,v
18 >>> retrieving revision 1.62 diff -u -p -r1.62 packages ---
19 >>> profiles/base/packages 12 Mar 2012 09:13:37 -0000 1.62
20 >>> +++ profiles/base/packages 17 May 2012 19:50:49 -0000 @@
21 >>> -61,7 +61,7 @@ #*sys-devel/libtool #*sys-devel/m4
22 >>> *sys-devel/make -*sys-devel/patch +*>=sys-devel/patch-2.6.1
23 >>> *sys-fs/e2fsprogs *virtual/dev-manager *virtual/editor
24 >>
25 >> What's the advantage/reward?
26 >
27 > <patch-2.6.1 fails if patch contains DOS -line endings, like the
28 > ones you get from some crappy pastebin services or Trac's
29 > webservice
30 >
31 >> =patch-2.6.1 doesn't have this problem, and this is what
32 >> developers are
33 > using anyway
34 >
35 > so less breakage, no possibility of these things slipping by
36 >
37 > consistent behavior
38 >
39 > profit!
40 >
41 > - Samuli
42 >
43
44 I'm in!
45
46 +1
47
48 - - Aaron
49 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
50 Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
51 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
52
53 iF4EAREIAAYFAk+1YbwACgkQVxOqA9G7/aCGtAD/TpWZt3OVe+3rvqupbJrd8hWu
54 TMYOHCGLhqqaIb8B2AABAIaq5UsEciS9A9PYiE23rwDuWzfZQts+WX06Rugc7Rkk
55 =QgUZ
56 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----