Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: stabilization policies
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:13:28
Message-Id: kv23r7$tlf$1@ger.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies by Tom Wijsman
1 On 21/08/2013 07:05, Tom Wijsman wrote:
2 > See `imlate --mtime=180 -s | less`. (From app-portage/gentoolkit-dev)
3 >
4 > I quote:
5 >
6 >> ==============================================
7 >> 4392 Stable candidates for 'gentoo' on 'amd64'
8 >> ==============================================
9 >
10 > Let's double the number to a year ago (360 instead of 180), I quote:
11 >
12 >> ==============================================
13 >> 2728 Stable candidates for 'gentoo' on 'amd64'
14 >> ==============================================
15 >
16 > And also get an impression of 3 months (90 instead of 180), I quote:
17 >
18 >> ==============================================
19 >> 6065 Stable candidates for 'gentoo' on 'amd64'
20 >> ==============================================
21 >
22 > At least the numbers for the year sound like something we will want to
23 > deal with; from there, we could try to keep half a year low. And after
24 > a while, we might end up ensuring stabilization within 3 months.
25 >
26 > That's still three times more than our intended stabilization delay...
27 >
28 For those not familiar with imlate, please note that these numbers
29 include packages that have never been stabilised.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: stabilization policies Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o>