1 |
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 12:39:33AM +0800, WANG Xuerui wrote: |
2 |
> I'm planning to take ARCH=loongarch for the port; and support the LP64 ABI |
3 |
> first. I'd like to support both LP64 and ILP32 ABIs, but that's not a |
4 |
> priority. |
5 |
|
6 |
> |
7 |
> The ABI flag might be named "ABI_LOONGARCH" but that's IMO a bit long (pun |
8 |
> semi-intended); ARCH=loong and ABI_LOONG might be better, I'm open to |
9 |
> suggestions. |
10 |
|
11 |
FWIW, I like loong and ABI_LOONG better, or even better would be to use the |
12 |
string `uname -m` returns for the hardware as ARCH and as the suffix for |
13 |
ABI_. |
14 |
|
15 |
William |