1 |
On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 14:43:14 -0500 |
2 |
William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> this eclass is an alternative to systemd.eclass, and maintains |
5 |
> full compatibility with it; however, it expands it so that it can query |
6 |
> pkgconfig for the directory paths. It returns the same default paths as |
7 |
> systemd.eclass if there is an error with pkgconfig. |
8 |
|
9 |
Alternative? So now developers decide whether they want support systemd |
10 |
A or systemd B? And we fork packages so that users can have matching |
11 |
set of packages? |
12 |
|
13 |
If you listened, you would know that the only reason I didn't apply |
14 |
your patches to the eclass was that nothing used them. If you really |
15 |
want to commit your quasi-fork, I will update the eclass. You |
16 |
don't really have to play silly games like this. |
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
Best regards, |
20 |
Michał Górny |