| 1 |
I wouldn't do it until mplayerplug-in works on it. I just realized it |
| 2 |
doesn't, last night. lot of people would probably be upset if it were |
| 3 |
stabilized. but they couldn't watch movies. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
On 10/29/06, Josh Saddler <nightmorph@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> Michal Kurgan wrote: |
| 7 |
> > Hello! |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > Recently new firefox-2.0 was released. |
| 10 |
> > I (and probably many other users) am interested when this new version would |
| 11 |
> > be unmasked and stabilized. If there are any problems, what are they and what |
| 12 |
> > to expect if i would force installation now? Is there any roadmap or timeline |
| 13 |
> > for stabilization already? |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > Thanks in advance for any answers. |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> There's no need to rush stabilization; being overly hasty leads to |
| 18 |
> broken systems. If you want it, it's in ~arch, so go get it. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Our own documentation gives a guideline of 1 month without outstanding |
| 21 |
> problems/open bugs. A quick search for "firefox 2.0" in Bugzilla shows a |
| 22 |
> few open bugs: |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> http://tinyurl.com/yjoy3w |
| 25 |
> -- |
| 26 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives