1 |
El lun, 19-03-2012 a las 22:41 -0500, Paul Varner escribió: |
2 |
> On 3/19/12 2:26 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
3 |
> > El lun, 19-03-2012 a las 10:56 -0500, Paul Varner escribió: |
4 |
> >> On 03/18/12 13:50, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
5 |
> >>> Due his retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: |
6 |
> >>> |
7 |
> >>> app-portage/maintainer-helper |
8 |
> >>> |
9 |
> >>> |
10 |
> >>> Thanks for taking them |
11 |
> >> |
12 |
> >> I've added app-portage/maintainer-helper to the tools-portage herd, |
13 |
> >> however, I've left it as maintainer-needed. So if anyone wants to take |
14 |
> >> it, feel free. The tools-portage herd will fix bugs for it as we find |
15 |
> >> the time. |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > I disagree with leaving maintainer-needed as default assign, if you will |
18 |
> > fix bugs when you have time it's better than what I will do with |
19 |
> > maintainer-needed packages. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Okay, I've taken out the maintainer-needed as the maintainer and have |
22 |
> just left it assigned to the herd. However, in reading through |
23 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=2&chap=4, I |
24 |
> don't see a good mechanism to convey that the package is up for grabs, |
25 |
> but in the meantime go ahead and assign any bugs to the herd. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Regards, |
28 |
> Paul |
29 |
> |
30 |
> |
31 |
|
32 |
Yeah, a mechanism for indicating a package is up for grabs would be |
33 |
interesting, the problem is how to prevent people from tagging as so a |
34 |
lot of packages and, then, making that mechanism completely useless as |
35 |
wouldn't distinct between "real" up for grabs packages or not "as |
36 |
real" :( |
37 |
|
38 |
But thanks a lot for taking care :) |