Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due jokey retirement
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 09:40:51
Message-Id: 1332236391.9921.5.camel@belkin4
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due jokey retirement by Paul Varner
1 El lun, 19-03-2012 a las 22:41 -0500, Paul Varner escribió:
2 > On 3/19/12 2:26 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
3 > > El lun, 19-03-2012 a las 10:56 -0500, Paul Varner escribió:
4 > >> On 03/18/12 13:50, Pacho Ramos wrote:
5 > >>> Due his retirement the following packages need a new maintainer:
6 > >>>
7 > >>> app-portage/maintainer-helper
8 > >>>
9 > >>>
10 > >>> Thanks for taking them
11 > >>
12 > >> I've added app-portage/maintainer-helper to the tools-portage herd,
13 > >> however, I've left it as maintainer-needed. So if anyone wants to take
14 > >> it, feel free. The tools-portage herd will fix bugs for it as we find
15 > >> the time.
16 > >
17 > > I disagree with leaving maintainer-needed as default assign, if you will
18 > > fix bugs when you have time it's better than what I will do with
19 > > maintainer-needed packages.
20 >
21 > Okay, I've taken out the maintainer-needed as the maintainer and have
22 > just left it assigned to the herd. However, in reading through
23 > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=2&chap=4, I
24 > don't see a good mechanism to convey that the package is up for grabs,
25 > but in the meantime go ahead and assign any bugs to the herd.
26 >
27 > Regards,
28 > Paul
29 >
30 >
31
32 Yeah, a mechanism for indicating a package is up for grabs would be
33 interesting, the problem is how to prevent people from tagging as so a
34 lot of packages and, then, making that mechanism completely useless as
35 wouldn't distinct between "real" up for grabs packages or not "as
36 real" :(
37
38 But thanks a lot for taking care :)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature