1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Jon Portnoy wrote: |
5 |
> On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 08:41:31AM -0500, Daniel Goller wrote: |
6 |
>> inviting community) and why you think stricter test make for better |
7 |
>> developers, why you think harder tests would cut down more on the quick |
8 |
>> in and out people. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Empirical evidence agrees. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Our current quiz practices have done a good job keeping out a lot of the |
13 |
> incompetence that used to slip through before we took that approach. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Stricter tests make for more knowledgable developers and folks with a |
16 |
> lack of commitment to Gentoo are usually not willing to tackle the |
17 |
> learning curve. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> As for whether or not we're inviting or not, anybody can contribute. |
20 |
> They don't need to be @gentoo.org to do so. What we really need is to |
21 |
> focus more on those outside contributions. |
22 |
> |
23 |
|
24 |
so that is where this is all coming from, who said that we should hand |
25 |
out @gentoo.org ? i never said that, they don't need it, and everyone |
26 |
gets to feel all special about the @gentoo.org the way they are used to, |
27 |
a committing contributor does not require a @gentoo.org |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
and unless you give them a general aptitude and attitude test, you do |
31 |
not know a thing about the person who answered a few technical questions |
32 |
(more) |
33 |
|
34 |
Daniel |
35 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
36 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux) |
37 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
38 |
|
39 |
iD8DBQFEU3pZ/aM9DdBw91cRArKPAKCCr/9TYUc+VTqldUueqXN5RRCUWgCfbSH8 |
40 |
5QfB8r0xd2qAr018yFICd9o= |
41 |
=aMhC |
42 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
43 |
-- |
44 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |