| 1 |
On 02/20/2017 03:47 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hey all, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> 1) Putting printer drivers into "net-print" is silly. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Something that converts format a to device-specific format b has absolutely |
| 7 |
> nothing to do with network. |
| 8 |
> So, a new category "sys-print", emphasizing that it's hardware drivers, (or |
| 9 |
> "cups-drv"?) (or maybe "media-print"?) might make sense. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> 2) After introducing that, however, "net-print" becomes nearly empty. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> On a quick glance, the only *network*-specific packages in there are cups and |
| 14 |
> lprng. Maybe one or two more which I dont recognize. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> So move cups and lprng to "net-misc" and drop "net-print"? |
| 17 |
> Or move them to new "sys-print" as well? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> What do you think? |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Cheers, |
| 22 |
> Andreas |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Moving stuff around seems sort of like busy work. I can see the |
| 26 |
reasoning and as mjeveritt mentioned in the other email a full category |
| 27 |
rename may work just as well (instead of moving a couple of packages and |
| 28 |
also a rename). The question to me is 'is there a great enough need to |
| 29 |
go through the pain of this?'. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) |
Archives