| 1 |
As active djbdns user, I'd actually prefer local use flags. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 12:36, Jared H. Hudson wrote: |
| 4 |
> I have several bug reports requesting patches to djbdns. I would like to |
| 5 |
> make these patches optional so that a user can emerge a "vanilla" djbdns |
| 6 |
> if they choose to. What is the best way to do this? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Create a super-djbdns port with all the patches? |
| 9 |
> Create a vanilla-djbdns port with no patches? |
| 10 |
> Use the current djbdns port, but create local use flags for each patch? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Some of the bug id#'s in question are: 14678, 19375, 20880, 31238 & 32080 |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Any suggestions would be appreciated. |
| 15 |
> Thanks, |
| 16 |
> Jared H. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> -- |
| 21 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Ilya Volynets |
| 24 |
Total Knowledge |
| 25 |
Chief Technology Officer |
| 26 |
http://www.total-knowledge.com |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives