Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: hwoarang@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Question about developer/bug assigned person's mail adress (as seen in Bug #453778)
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 20:46:20
Message-Id: 20130402224656.115943e1@pomiocik.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Question about developer/bug assigned person's mail adress (as seen in Bug #453778) by Markos Chandras
1 On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 21:37:45 +0100
2 Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > On Apr 2, 2013 9:24 PM, "Martin Dummer" <martin.dummer@×××.net> wrote:
5 > > Bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=453778 is assigned to
6 > > "Dustin Polke" <gentoobugsie.20.dsurawicz@×××××××××××.com>
7 > >
8 > > While the bug is easy to fix and close, no action happens.
9 > > So I tried to find out whats the meaning of this strange email address.
10 > >
11 > > After a visit to https://spamgourmet.com/ this mail address means that
12 > > only the first 20 emails send to this address are forwarded to the
13 > > registered user's real mail address. Any further mails are discarded.
14 > >
15 > > Now my question: is this a good behaviour for a developer?
16 > >
17 > > What's your opinion?
18 >
19 > The developer is active he just does not need a working e-mail address.
20
21 In my opinion every developer *should* have a working e-mail address.
22 Imagine that someone might want to mail him -- it's really impolite to
23 provide a fake address which will drop all incoming mail silently.
24
25 --
26 Best regards,
27 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies