| 1 |
* Harald van D??k <truedfx@g.o> schrieb: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
hi, |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> What would it do if a gcc-specific option is used for which |
| 6 |
> the real compiler does not provide any option, even with a |
| 7 |
> different name? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
hmm, tricky. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I've filed an bug in gcc-upstream for an similar issue, where |
| 12 |
gcc/ld is missing some an flag allowing to filter exported |
| 13 |
symbols of shared libs. Hopefully this issue will be solved |
| 14 |
soon by the gcc team. Until then I have to strip off that option, |
| 15 |
hoping it does not break anything. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
But nevertheless it would be a great step to adapt at least |
| 18 |
those options which are supported. Completely unsupported |
| 19 |
options (which cannot be substituted somehow) are a major |
| 20 |
problem anyways. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
cu |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 26 |
Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ |
| 27 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 28 |
Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: |
| 29 |
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce |
| 30 |
Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: |
| 31 |
http://patches.metux.de/ |
| 32 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives