| 1 |
On Wednesday 18 January 2012 11:55:30 Alexis Ballier wrote: |
| 2 |
> > 3) Check your rdepend, where is possible with scanelf[3] and if you |
| 3 |
> > declare it, please, as you said, exclude gcc/glibc and all package |
| 4 |
> > from @system |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> imho this has nothing to do with stabilization |
| 7 |
There is a misunderstading about it. I did not mean what the other sayd. |
| 8 |
So, if is not clear, the goal should be: check your RDEPEND before filing |
| 9 |
stabilization. Stop |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> what i dislike in this approach is that arch testers will follow a |
| 13 |
> test plan which the maintainer has obviously tested before and knows |
| 14 |
> it works. |
| 15 |
> sending people into the jungle of 'try to do something with $pkg' may |
| 16 |
> make them encounter problems the maintainer hadnt thought about. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I think the same, but just for your info, there are, imho, few people that |
| 19 |
works in popular arches like x86/amd64 and is not possible because of missing |
| 20 |
of 'tester', imagine in arches like sparc/ia64 where only people like armin76 |
| 21 |
works =) |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Agostino Sarubbo ago -at- gentoo.org |
| 24 |
Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Security Liaison |
| 25 |
GPG: 0x7CD2DC5D |
Archives