Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Seemant Kulleen <seemant@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 19:31:24
Message-Id: 1175282932.5964.9.camel@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis by Matthias Langer
1 On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 20:42 +0200, Matthias Langer wrote:
3 >
4 > i don't think that personal issues should be taken into account when it
5 > comes to choosing a new official package manager for gentoo.
7 It's relevant in that people have to work with the developers of the
8 package manager. Unlike most other things in the portage tree, the
9 package manager ties very closely to the very definition of the
10 distribution itself. Hence, if people are unable to get along, then by
11 adopting a package manager like that, you inherently adopt the
12 developers of that package manager and all the personnel issues that
13 accompany it.
15 Ideally, however, I agree with you that it should be based on technical
16 merits. The reality is that there are people involved. And people
17 always complicate things.


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis Rumen Yotov <rumen@××××××.org>
[gentoo-dev] Re: [soc] Python bindings for Paludis Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>