| 1 |
On Sat, 19 May 2012 12:28:02 -0700 |
| 2 |
Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 5 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> On 17/05/12 01:40, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > 1/ Mike suggested something like: |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > EGIT_REPO_URI=( "repo1 fallback1" "repo2 fallback2" ) |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > but IMO it hurts readability and makes the behavior a little |
| 15 |
> > surprising (not that the fallback syntax isn't surprising already). |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Does not look that bad, do you have an actual example so we can see |
| 18 |
> how bad could get? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Well, for example if the project was hosted on github, it would look |
| 21 |
like: |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
EGIT_REPO_URI=( |
| 24 |
"git://github.com/foo/foo.git |
| 25 |
http://github.com/foo/foo.git" |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
"git://github.com/foo/bar.git |
| 28 |
http://github.com/foo/bar.git" |
| 29 |
) |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Or something like that. What I am afraid of is that we use nested list |
| 32 |
with tricky syntax, and one could miss the specifics of "" use. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
Best regards, |
| 36 |
Michał Górny |
Archives