1 |
On 08 Mar 2002 17:51:17 +0100 |
2 |
Erik Grinaker <erikg@××××××××××××××.net> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 16:55, Sean Mitchell wrote: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> > Well, the rest of that whole post aside, many of us have had trouble with |
7 |
> > grub because we have no separate /boot partition. In my case, my /boot |
8 |
> > partition is on /dev/hde1, which grub just can't seem to find. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > I like grub, but I've had much more success with lilo. |
11 |
|
12 |
I find this interesting, because grub in situations *without* a |
13 |
separate /boot partition is super-easy! I've never run it in |
14 |
any other way. In the menu.lst, just have everything refer |
15 |
to /boot/<kernel> and so on, (because that is where it *is*), |
16 |
and use |
17 |
root (hd0,0) |
18 |
(actually, for you, (hd4,0), right?) |
19 |
|
20 |
I haven't used lilo for a couple of years now, and i've been exclusively |
21 |
grub. Grub has let me down *once* in all that time, and that was because |
22 |
I was an idjit and "upgraded" the files and re-ran grub to install the |
23 |
new code. It was a problem with the Debian package at the time and it |
24 |
horked all over the floor (very messy -- needed a mop,...) |
25 |
I fixed it with my grub boot floppy, which I made off of my gentoo box. |
26 |
Yay! Problem solved. With LILO, it was always one thing or another. |
27 |
I had a boot disk *handy*. |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
The Amazing* Jon Nelson <jnelson@××××××××××.com> |
31 |
C and Python Programmer, Code Gardener |
32 |
Just because it's not broken doesn't mean we can't take it apart. |
33 |
(* may not actually amaze) |