Archives
Archives
| From: | Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH eutils] Die if epunt_cxx is called unnecessarily. | ||
| Date: | Wed, 30 Jan 2013 23:47:08 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20130130175720.24c2e426@caribou.gateway.2wire.net | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] [PATCH eutils] Die if epunt_cxx is called unnecessarily. by "Michał Górny" |
||
| 1 | On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:36:53 +0100 |
| 2 | Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > Currently, epunt_cxx always succeeds. This results in some |
| 5 | > of the ebuilds keeping its use even though the C++ checks were removed |
| 6 | > upstream. |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > Therefore, I'm suggesting to add a simple check to the function -- if |
| 9 | > none of the patching attempts succeed, die requesting the user to remove |
| 10 | > the invocation. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | eqawarn? |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | gcc-porting |
| 17 | toolchain, wxwidgets learn a language baby, it's that kind of place |
| 18 | @ gentoo.org where low card is hunger and high card is taste |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH eutils] Die if epunt_cxx is called unnecessarily. | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> |