Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:52:38
Message-Id: slrnlt793j.9i1.martin@epidot.math.uni-rostock.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps by Maxim Kammerer
1 Maxim Kammerer <mk@×××.su> wrote:
2 > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:25 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
3 >> The funny thing is, almost none of the Gentoo developers even know that
4 >> slot operators disable dynamic dependencies completely in portage.
5 >
6 > So *that's* why I now have to change RDEPENDs in both the source
7 > ebuild and in VDB in order to augment package's dependencies before
8 > depclean...
9
10 Yes, static deps are a completely broken idea if not every change
11 causes a revbump: There does not exist something like a "minor"
12 change in dependencies.