| 1 |
On Friday 06 August 2004 11:18 am, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Friday 06 August 2004 14:41, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 3 |
> > All those have a definite solution, but doing it in code that isn't as |
| 4 |
> > slow as hell is another matter. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Well, I'll try to work on it with fast code |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
i think what he was trying to get at is that he hasnt heard of your portage_ng |
| 9 |
work before ... the portage devs get kind of angry when they hear of people |
| 10 |
working on 'ng' projects with the idea of replacing the current portage ... |
| 11 |
not because the project will replace portage, but because it was worked on |
| 12 |
completely removed from the current development process |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
this 'ng' projects will be a *lot* better if everyone knows what everyone else |
| 15 |
is doing and people work together instead of different groups working in |
| 16 |
isolation ... why waste development time developing the same damn thing |
| 17 |
-mike |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives