Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Stuart Herbert <stuart.herbert@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-dev-announce list
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 07:37:13
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-dev-announce list by Donnie Berkholz
On 6/25/06, Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o> wrote:
> This topic has come up in the past, and I'd like to revive it once > again. The gentoo-dev list has gotten a lower and lower signal to noise > ratio over the past year or two, and it's difficult to dig out the stuff > that's truly required reading.
What's noise to you is signal to others. For example, my interest is servers, so all of your posts are mostly noise to me, but to others it's essential signal. Same goes for the scientific re-org recently discussed. And I'm sure the same goes for PHP & webapp stuff.
> I propose that all need-to-know announcements and decisions be posted to > a separate, moderated (or restricted posting) gentoo-dev-announce list > to ensure that no developers lose track of what really matters.
I think a -dev-announce ML is a good idea, with reply-to set to -dev. But I also think you're over-exaggerating the situation by a long way, sorry. Best regards, Stu -- PS: If anyone needs anything posting on -announce, I'm one of the people you can bribe :) -- gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-dev-announce list Simon Stelling <blubb@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-dev-announce list Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@×××××.de>
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-dev-announce list Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>