| 1 |
Dear All, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
As you know, the Gentoo Council had its third monthly meeting on |
| 4 |
20051115 at 2000 UTC. On the agenda were GLEP #41 and a summary of |
| 5 |
portage signing. In attendance were the following Council members: |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
az (Martin Schlemmer) |
| 8 |
koon (Thierry Carrez) |
| 9 |
seemant (Seemant Kulleen) |
| 10 |
solar (Ned Ludd) |
| 11 |
swift (Sven Vermeulen) |
| 12 |
vapier (Mike Frysinger) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Absent from the meeting was agriffis (Aron Griffis). |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
The authors of GLEP #41 made the changes to the GLEP's wording as |
| 17 |
requested by the council during October's meeting. Thus, it was brought |
| 18 |
to vote. Before I relieve you of the suspense of the vote's outcome, |
| 19 |
let me say that a policy decision also came about as a result of last |
| 20 |
night's vote. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
GLEP 41 was never resubmitted to this mailing list (gentoo-dev) after |
| 23 |
the wording changed. Most of the council members were uncomfortable |
| 24 |
with this idea. That was the first and *only* time the council will |
| 25 |
vote that way again. Following this, every resubmission must be |
| 26 |
discussed on -dev for 7 days minimum before being resubmitted to the |
| 27 |
council 7 days before that meeting. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
As such, GLEP 41 was voted in by majority (only one dissenting vote). |
| 30 |
The subdomain for the arch tester email aliases has not been decided (it |
| 31 |
is beyond the scope of the council's role in the GLEP). |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
The last agenda item was a summary of the progress of portage signing as |
| 35 |
presented by Marius Mauch (genone). The story is dismal -- no progress |
| 36 |
has really been made because nobody has taken ownership of implementing |
| 37 |
it yet. Thus, the Council decided that its members would scratch the |
| 38 |
beginnings of the GLEP together and forward that GLEP to the original |
| 39 |
participants/proposers in the prior discussion (which was carried out |
| 40 |
last year under the old metastructure management). From there the GLEP |
| 41 |
will be presented to -dev for discussion before the Council takes |
| 42 |
further action on it. The Council has agreed to forward their scratch |
| 43 |
GLEP to the original proposers/partcipants before December's Council |
| 44 |
meeting. |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
As always, the log is in CVS, please see: |
| 47 |
http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/xml/htdocs/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20051115.txt?root=gentoo&rev=1.1&view=markup |
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
Thanks, |
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
Seemant Kulleen |
| 52 |
-- |
| 53 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives