| 1 |
On Tuesday 09 November 2004 04:56, Georgi Georgiev wrote: |
| 2 |
> Portage has a list of all categories ($PORTDIR/profiles/categories), so |
| 3 |
> walking down the tree and looking here or there whether what you see is |
| 4 |
> a category or not, is not an issue. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Indeed. Did not notice that yet. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> > I general I don't think that arbitrary depths lower the complexity to |
| 9 |
> > find a specific package. Most likely it will raises the complexity of the |
| 10 |
> > Portage code quite a bit, though. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> To me, it seems that it should be trivial. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
With the categories stored in a file, yes. Seems I missed the discussion, but |
| 15 |
I still don't see a benefit in arbitrary depths categories. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Carsten |
Archives