Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@×××××.net>
To: Bob Thomas <gtg663h@×××××××××××.edu>, gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage wants to downgrade
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 17:58:21
Message-Id: 002701c2a1e2$5b84b5e0$c00c460a@pro.tl.thomcorp.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Portage wants to downgrade by Bob Thomas
1 It is because perl 5.8.0 is masked. You could trying runing the
2 unstable/testing version, ~.
3
4 Tom Veldhouse
5
6 ----- Original Message -----
7 From: "Bob Thomas" <gtg663h@×××××××××××.edu>
8 To: "gentoo-dev" <gentoo-dev@g.o>
9 Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 6:32 PM
10 Subject: [gentoo-dev] Portage wants to downgrade
11
12
13 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
14 > Hash: SHA1
15 >
16 > When I run emerge -up world I get the following:
17 >
18 > [ebuild UD] sys-devel/perl-5.6.1-r7 [5.8.0-r3]
19 > [ebuild UD] app-crypt/gnupg-1.0.7 [1.2.1-r0]
20 > [ebuild UD] net-www/mozilla-1.0.1-r3 [1.2.1-r1]
21 >
22 > These are masked packages that I installed earlier today. These are not
23 > the only masked packages that I currently have installed, but it's what
24 > I've installed today. Is it a coincidence that these are packages that I
25 > just installed (and there's something special about them), or could this
26 > be something that recently changed in Portage (the "D" is new to me) ?
27 >
28 > - --
29 > Robert Thomas
30 > Georgia Institute of Technology
31 > Email: gtg663h@×××××××××××.edu
32 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
33 > Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
34 > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
35 >
36 > iD8DBQE999kgkRe6eFyQaRcRArkbAJ9DRYXuwqfk7qEke6hQaqs+GcgaZACffTn5
37 > 6BwCZ1XZl1R6lZPpKKKRulM=
38 > =SAR7
39 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
40 >
41 >
42 > --
43 > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
44 >
45 >
46
47
48 --
49 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage wants to downgrade Bob Thomas <gtg663h@×××××××××××.edu>