Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New PDEPEND behaviour.
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:51:39
Message-Id: 46A74633.2080906@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] New PDEPEND behaviour. by "Piotr Jaroszyński"
1 Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
2 > Hello,
3 >
4 > As a result of bug #180045 PDEPENDs can be now merged even before the package
5 > that pulls them. Zmedico says that's intended behaviour and PDEPEND is really
6 > a RDEPEND, but with a ability to resolve circular deps:
7 > circular DEPEND <-> RDEPEND can't be resolved while circular DEPEND <->
8 > PDEPEND can.
9 > Random behaviour occurs when there is a circular RDEPEND <-> PDEPEND, e.g. bug
10 > #186517.
11 >
12 > We need to update docs or harass zmedico to force PDEPEND to be pulled as soon
13 > as possible but not before the pkg that pulls it.
14 >
15
16 Now how in the world do you pull a depend that needs to be merged AFTER
17 the original package?
18
19 i.e. Package ABC and Package XYZ... Package XYZ is a series of config
20 files and data for Package ABC. The files of XYZ need to be owned by
21 user abc which gets created by Package ABC. Those files also need to be
22 installed in /usr/share/abc, which gets created by Package ABC.
23
24 --
25 Doug Goldstein <cardoe@g.o>
26 http://dev.gentoo.org/~cardoe/
27
28 --
29 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] New PDEPEND behaviour. Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>