1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Not any actual test data, no, but from experience that seems to be the case. |
5 |
Also, until recently, Mozilla.org had been recommending new users 1.0 because |
6 |
of stability. |
7 |
Is there any reason *not* to have it in Portage? |
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
On Friday 25 July 2003 03:59 am, Owen Gunden wrote: |
11 |
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 01:34:28AM +0000, Luke-Jr wrote: |
12 |
> > Seeing as Mozilla 1.0.1 is *still* the most stable version (never seen a |
13 |
> > 1.0 crash), I would hope it would still be available in Portage for a |
14 |
> > while... |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Do you have any data to back this up? Because that's not been my |
17 |
> experience at all. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Owen |
20 |
> |
21 |
> -- |
22 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
23 |
|
24 |
- -- |
25 |
Luke-Jr |
26 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
27 |
http://www.gentoo.org/ |
28 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
29 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) |
30 |
|
31 |
iD8DBQE/ILLqZl/BHdU+lYMRAnpbAJ48gZWwIiipjSbv2q+JkDMkeVzPdwCfWPrb |
32 |
MiCRnmdqOfVMKcShLM/J1L8= |
33 |
=Wcr3 |
34 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |