Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Tom Gall <tom_gall@×××.com>
To: john_davis@×××××××××××××××××××.com
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo's policy on sender id
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 16:26:31
Message-Id: 58395A8E-FF58-11D8-9CE6-0003939E069A@mac.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] gentoo's policy on sender id by John Davis
1 On Sep 5, 2004, at 9:00 AM, John Davis wrote:
2
3 > Hi all -
4 > Recent [1] announcements [2] from other large projects have prompted
5 > this inquiry - should Gentoo adopt similar policies regarding Sender ID
6 > and make a public statement or is it not worth our time?
7
8 Personally I wonder how much of the attention with regards to Sender ID
9 is more of a dig against micro$oft. O wait that's the "in" thing to
10 do. :-)
11
12 But what does saying something really mean? Would it be somewhat sorta
13 like the xfree86 license change situation?
14
15 IE we won't have any package in portage that implements Sender ID?
16
17 Regards,
18
19 Tom
20
21 > 1. http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/09/05/138257&tid=111&tid=1
22 > 2.
23 > http://apache.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/09/02/
24 > 1446229&tid=148&tid=155&tid=109&tid=95
25 > --
26 > John Davis
27 > Gentoo Linux Developer
28 > <http://dev.gentoo.org/~zhen>
29 >
30 > ----
31 > GnuPG Public Key: <http://dev.gentoo.org/~zhen/zhen_pub.asc>
32 > Fingerprint: 4F9E 41F6 D072 5C1A 636C 2D46 B92C 4823 E281 41BB
33 >
34 Tom Gall
35 Gentoo/PPC64 Team Leader
36 tgall@g.o
37
38
39 --
40 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list