Archives
Archives
| From: | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] The status of the 'minor' arches in gentoo | ||
| Date: | Sun, 17 Feb 2013 19:31:35 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAGfcS_k0XZzN-VvLe1jGr4Uu0CV0xvfWGc6Mn3v9tA5VvoDkPA@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] The status of the 'minor' arches in gentoo by "Andreas K. Huettel" |
||
| 1 | On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Andreas K. Huettel |
| 2 | <dilfridge@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > Joking aside, I can imagine architectures where it's preferable to set up a |
| 4 | > stage directly from a running maintenance system (maybs s390???). Also, none |
| 5 | > of my arm gadgets comes with a CD drive, so I had to e.g. prepare the stage on |
| 6 | > a memory card with another box. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | I wonder if there is a market for selling pre-imaged core planes with |
| 9 | Gentoo in ramfs? |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Rich |