Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Paweł Hajdan
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] pax-utils.eclass: elog -> einfo?
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:27:24
Message-Id: 4D874401.2010301@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] pax-utils.eclass: elog -> einfo? by Mike Frysinger
1 On 3/17/11 11:18 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
2 > also, this code is run at the pkg_* stage, so it's not the normal src host
3 > feature detection. and we're talking about minor output behavior.
4
5 Is calling pax-mark in src_compile a misuse then? At least one ebuild I
6 maintain does that (and at least in one case it'd have to be either in
7 src_compile or src_test because the test binary has to be pax-mark-ed).
8
9 By the way, what do you think about using the "hardened" USE flag to
10 control the elog behavior, and forcing it on the hardened profile? In my
11 opinion it's a bit hacky.
12
13 Would it make more sense to scan all installed files in pkg_postinst for
14 pax-mark-ed files, and then elog something?
15
16 Paweł Hajdan, Jr.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] pax-utils.eclass: elog -> einfo? Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>