1 |
On 24 May 2012 19:01, Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> I've never had very good luck with g-cpan. I thought there were a lot |
3 |
> of dev-perl ebuilds in portage for CPAN modules and that g-cpan was |
4 |
> for those that hadn't been added to portage yet? |
5 |
|
6 |
Yes, to an extent. Also, if you haven't already, check out the |
7 |
perl-experiemental overlay, which has a much, much larger collection |
8 |
of Perl Module ebuilds. |
9 |
|
10 |
Its not as well maintained as the main tree, but its not bad IMO* |
11 |
|
12 |
you might get lucky and somebody might put it in the tree for you if |
13 |
g-cpan doesn't want to work. |
14 |
|
15 |
* biased, I do a large amount of that =p |
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
Kent |
22 |
|
23 |
perl -e "print substr( \"edrgmaM SPA NOcomil.ic\\@tfrken\", \$_ * 3, |
24 |
3 ) for ( 9,8,0,7,1,6,5,4,3,2 );" |
25 |
|
26 |
http://kent-fredric.fox.geek.nz |