| 1 |
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 00:11:43 +0100 |
| 2 |
Carsten Lohrke <carlo@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> There's absolutely no reason to absorb every single version naming |
| 5 |
> scheme on earth. Gentoo's does work nicely and more than we have |
| 6 |
> would only be irritating to the user. Simply use _pre<datecode> or |
| 7 |
> whatever fits, but extending our naming scheme is unneeded and |
| 8 |
> pointless. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
And of course there is the issue of how older Portage releases will |
| 11 |
react to ebuild names that they don't understand. |
| 12 |
-- |
| 13 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives