| 1 |
On Sun, 17 May 2009 19:18:14 +0100 |
| 2 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Sun, 17 May 2009 12:15:24 -0600 |
| 5 |
> Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > I'd like 2 if we could have multiple same-versioned ebuilds of |
| 7 |
> > different EAPI. 3 is good enough for me. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> We couldn't. Allowing multiple equal but different ebuilds gets highly |
| 10 |
> crazy -- EAPIs aren't orderable, so it's not obvious which one the |
| 11 |
> package manager should select. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Ah, right. I knew there was a reason. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
gcc-porting, by design, by neglect |
| 18 |
treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect |
| 19 |
wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |
Archives