Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Please review fortran-2.eclass next round
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:02:51
Message-Id: 201106171241.19608.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Please review fortran-2.eclass next round by Kacper Kowalik
1 On Friday, June 17, 2011 05:01:10 Kacper Kowalik wrote:
2 > W dniu 17.06.2011 05:03, Mike Frysinger pisze:
3 > >> DEPEND="virtual/fortran"
4 > >>
5 > >> > RDEPEND="${DEPEND}"
6 > >
7 > > i'm not sure that RDEPEND is correct. do all fortran compilers
8 > > additionally require the fortran compiler to be available at runtime ?
9 >
10 > They require fortran runtime library if they don't link it statically.
11
12 *if* there is a fortran runtime library in the first place. gcc provides one,
13 but does that mean all fortran compilers do ?
14 -mike

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Please review fortran-2.eclass next round Kacper Kowalik <xarthisius@g.o>