| 1 |
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 01:59:36 +0100 |
| 2 |
Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Tom Wijsman wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > > I'd say that if around 7 people vote on the matter that that is |
| 6 |
> > > > based on a necessary amount of understanding. |
| 7 |
> > > |
| 8 |
> > > That is just incredibly naïve. |
| 9 |
> .. |
| 10 |
> > > You need to learn to respect what you don't know that you don't |
| 11 |
> > > know. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > Or you apply knowledge codification and mark it as experimental. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> No, that's what you *know* that you don't know. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Exactly, which effectively keeps us away from unknown unknowns; by |
| 18 |
turning them into efficient known knowns. This is how risk prevention |
| 19 |
works, which makes the person whom does risk analysis see a sunny day. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
With kind regards, |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
| 25 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
| 28 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
| 29 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |
Archives