Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] arch teams and better tools
Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 20:06:20
Message-Id: BANLkTinBA=FfwNKv9HBVORFBdBug8u74Ww@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] arch teams and better tools by Peter Volkov
1 On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:54 AM, Peter Volkov <pva@g.o> wrote:
2 > Hi!
3 >
4 > В Вск, 22/05/2011 в 10:13 +0200, Thomas Kahle пишет:
5 >> On 18:44 Sat 21 May     , "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
6 >
7 >> > Here's my answer to that, still in very early development:
8 >> > <http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/arch-tools.git;a=summary>
9 >
10 >> Have you seen app-portage/tatt ?
11 >> https://github.com/tom111/tatt
12 >
13 > It looks that quite similar functionality is required to open
14 > stabilization bugs. It's really takes time to check that there is no
15 > bugs opened in the package and all dependent libraries, then to copy all
16 > maintainers and create list of packages with archs like:
17 >
18 > cate-gory/library-ver  amd64 ppc ppc64 x86
19 > cate-gory/pkg-ver amd64 x86
20 >
21 > Have anybody thought/programmed such tool? :)
22 >
23
24 One part of this, i.e. the generation of that list of packages with
25 arches, is done by a script that the gnome and gstreamer herds use:
26
27 http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/gnome.git;a=blob;f=scripts/gen_archlist.py;hb=HEAD
28
29 Usage: ./gen_archlist.py <file with atoms>
30
31 Reading the script leads to eye-bleeds (it needs to be rewritten), but
32 it works quite well. Here's some example output:
33 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368281
34
35 --
36 ~Nirbheek Chauhan
37
38 Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team