| 1 |
On Sat, 2006-10-07 at 09:58 +0100, Roy Bamford wrote: |
| 2 |
> I replied in your part of the thread because Release Engineering are |
| 3 |
> the obvious users of the mooted plans and reports. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
That was kinda my point. We aren't. We really don't care what version |
| 6 |
of Gnome/KDE/kernel get in the release. We just care that whatever it |
| 7 |
is, it works. We work with the respective teams, but we leave it up to |
| 8 |
them what we use. It happens to work out quite well this way. Reports |
| 9 |
from teams such as Gnome and KDE would be more useful to users, I would |
| 10 |
think, than to most developers. Any developers that it would impact are |
| 11 |
likely already in the know. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Again, the last thing that I want to do is enforce some arbitrary |
| 14 |
reporting where it isn't necessary. I do agree that it definitely is |
| 15 |
necessary in some places, though. It just isn't necessary ubiquitously. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 19 |
Release Engineering Strategic Lead |
| 20 |
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams |
| 21 |
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee |
| 22 |
Gentoo Foundation |
Archives