| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Forcing a change in your gcc version for compiling is less then |
| 5 |
optimal. I don't believe the eclass has anything in it that will help |
| 6 |
in what you are trying to do. I would probably do a pkg_setup with a |
| 7 |
check for the version of gcc if it isn't a 3.* version then you exit |
| 8 |
building and give the reason for this...This would probably be the |
| 9 |
best way to do it, at this point. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
brettholcomb@×××××××××.net wrote: |
| 12 |
> What about gcc-config - will that work? |
| 13 |
>> From: Sven Köhler <skoehler@×××.de> Date: 2006/06/16 Fri PM |
| 14 |
>> 03:10:08 EDT To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o Subject: |
| 15 |
>> [gentoo-dev] using specific gcc-version in ebuild |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 22 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) |
| 23 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
iD8DBQFEkwcUSENan+PfizARAjLdAJ9u6zhasuWe4AT5x3+rcOAMlgqovwCeLPNf |
| 26 |
NLU57K0Bl7uuneLhujKRLck= |
| 27 |
=nSTb |
| 28 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives