Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mario Fetka <mario.fetka@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] package graveyard
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 17:33:38
Message-Id: CAEiG6VTK_wUwbf0-SVhSexcH8ndAGjSoHr_acHnxX1adf47aCQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] package graveyard by Markos Chandras
1 most users just hunt the program name and gentoo to a searchengine
2 they get the info that the ebuild is in cvs but in graveyard.
3
4 but hey i am just a user.
5
6 Mario
7
8 2011/8/17 Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>:
9 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
10 > Hash: SHA512
11 >
12 > On 17/08/2011 06:04 ??, Mario Fetka wrote:
13 >> how about adding a new tag metadata,xml so that it is not imported
14 >> into the rsync tree
15 >>
16 > What is the difference between your proposal and removing the package?
17 > In both cases, the broken ebuild does not get propagated to users.
18 >
19 > - --
20 > Regards,
21 > Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
22 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
23 > Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
24 >
25 > iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOS/bcAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCKGEP/AnDf0J9DVaRKfS6vpciexHx
26 > QY8HEKnwQs5wUHnjxWvwl4135NwA5mZ2jJw6upgddDjbZaBh9a5L9yZOIS5VE9k1
27 > 2vCu+rTBdugqp5oHpFDtNpdW0QwMI1vcUJCUQR51jtZNqR/0CrBtaWtAvL4lhN+1
28 > cyYsTQyRR5zyaA19WZlzXYZybv6m9N7tZYxEXf/usFBy/T8x21aH2igt5OFld1ts
29 > XVxV25QKhC2D2sNMbHJ/YJvyd8f/AQBidekCOR8PcgbJPTiS8HDvGgMO9QP2CFX3
30 > ksFsEFSA9W8HXdDtaYY2SN7bbAYyCK0zP2x6e693ndAiCvwM3UqRWkBR9DCIfkYm
31 > o5h9uY7kgCbH0wQc/5/fpf8buPS3UHIcmlopQoqMn9qhIEL36O/QN5JX4NEFt9JQ
32 > s4sJf/zS6lLbDv2hZB/Efdo2L33CCIlF28BukL+WyfR2OBtDdIQdxvQmhLXkFTkv
33 > v8AYufyTtKZ4NRMzFXlXdJ3t0PdUNyX7P5+g2V5VBPaz3TtsFC8u9K1byK5ApTH8
34 > 9PBBHTs4NjriMS1JQFQWIZIG1TpxcSJAk6Xda+O64RSUfs7ajfGK7JyiPNAJPSWr
35 > EIEtv7Rc40pDjjbAybRkN7onbOq107XTA+rWsXCMI4oOMcNZBzv81OUVk6L3qt9h
36 > dsBPgWmweXQ+DktfDo8P
37 > =vwO5
38 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
39 >
40 >