Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "W.Kenworthy" <billk@×××××××××.au>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for advanced useflag-syntax
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 01:49:38
Message-Id: 1155001487.5369.4.camel@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for advanced useflag-syntax by Enrico Weigelt
1 On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 15:48 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
2 > * Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> schrieb:
3
4 ...
5 > Let's take a better example: nmap
6 > This package actually contains two completely different things:
7 > the portscanner tool and some gtk-based frontend. In fact the "gtk"
8 > useflag switches the second package.
9 >
10 > They're in fact two different applications (just one shipped as
11 > an subdir of another) and so should have two ebuilds.
12 >
13
14 As a user, please dont do that. Fragmentation by splitting packages up
15 is getting ridiculous. Yes, use a USE flag, but dont make it harder for
16 users to find, build and install.
17
18 My personal opinion is that whilst things like modular X are good for
19 developers, they are not so good for users - particularly gentoo users.
20
21 BillK
22
23 --
24 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for advanced useflag-syntax Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for advanced useflag-syntax Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>