1 |
Mike Frysinger wrote: |
2 |
> On Thursday 27 July 2006 18:21, Stephen P. Becker wrote: |
3 |
>> Looking at the meeting log, the |
4 |
>> council even noted that the concerns had not been addressed |
5 |
> |
6 |
> no, we noted that people claimed they had concerns but when cornered and asked |
7 |
> what exactly their concerns were, no more responses were to be had |
8 |
> |
9 |
> people need to bring up their outstanding issues now and get them addressed |
10 |
|
11 |
Ok, since the first time around apparently wasn't good enough, how about |
12 |
this? This project sucks. It takes random ebuilds without enough merit |
13 |
or demand to even have some team and/or developer within Gentoo pick it |
14 |
up, and dumps it to a |
15 |
user-supported-yet-completely-official-break-my-gentoo-style tree that |
16 |
has to potential to cause all sorts of QA problems. It flies right in |
17 |
the face of those of us that have strived to educate users not to rice |
18 |
out their systems with outside-the-tree ebuilds that have not gone |
19 |
through some sort of arch team and/or maintainer QA before hitting the |
20 |
tree. There is nothing you or anyone else can say that will make me |
21 |
think otherwise, and I think it needs to be killed. Now. |
22 |
|
23 |
-Steve |
24 |
-- |
25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |