1 |
Thank you! This bug is on my list, but I hadn't had a chance yet to work |
2 |
on it. Thanks! |
3 |
|
4 |
Michael |
5 |
|
6 |
|
7 |
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 10:26:19PM +0100, Alex Dicks wrote: |
8 |
> Emerging gtk-perl failed on my machine. It appears that the |
9 |
> package's Makefile.PL checks for various dependencies, including |
10 |
> gdkpixbuf. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> It is older than the current version of gdkpixbuf in portage, which |
13 |
> is 0.20.0. Therefore, the check for the presence of gdkpixbuf fails, |
14 |
> as it detects the wrong version. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> I patched my gtk-perl-0.7008-r4.ebuild with a line that runs sed to |
17 |
> tweak Makefile.PL into accepting the new version. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> --- gtk-perl-0.7008-r4.ebuild_orig 2002-10-15 21:45:25.000000000 +0100 |
20 |
> +++ gtk-perl-0.7008-r4.ebuild 2002-10-15 21:46:00.000000000 +0100 |
21 |
> @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ |
22 |
> src_compile() { |
23 |
> |
24 |
> cd ${S} |
25 |
> + mv Makefile.PL Makefile.PL_dist |
26 |
> + sed -e "s/\(gdk-pixbuf-config.*\)8|9|1/\18|9|1|2/" < Makefile.PL_dist > Makefile.PL |
27 |
> cp Makefile.PL Makefile.PL.bak |
28 |
> perl -pi -e '/CCMD/ && s|/m;|/mg;|' */Makefile.PL |
29 |
> perl-module_src_compile |
30 |
> |
31 |
> That's diff -u's output on my patch, though it'll probably get |
32 |
> mangled in email. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> I'm very new to Gentoo, but I hope this is of some use. |
35 |
> _______________________________________________ |
36 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
37 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
38 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |