1 |
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:19:38 -0400 Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
|
2 |
wrote:
|
3 |
| On Thursday 18 August 2005 12:09 pm, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
|
4 |
| > On Thursday 18 August 2005 17:55, Mike Frysinger wrote:
|
5 |
| > > considering the number of packages that use pmake, why do you
|
6 |
| > > want an eclass for it ? i'd say just put the logic in the
|
7 |
| > > ebuilds themselves
|
8 |
| >
|
9 |
| > Add all the ones we use on G/FBSD overlay, and the count increase :)
|
10 |
| > The eclass is currently in place for G/FBSD overlay only, but as
|
11 |
| > someday we'll merge into tree...
|
12 |
|
|
13 |
| ok, but then you still have the fact that you're writting an eclass
|
14 |
| for a single function ... isnt that the point of eutils ?
|
15 |
|
16 |
No! There's too much crap in eutils already.
|
17 |
|
18 |
--
|
19 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron)
|
20 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org
|
21 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |