1 |
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 09:26:20PM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
2 |
> On 02/02/2017 09:22 PM, Sam Jorna wrote: |
3 |
> > |
4 |
> > Also, how would this work with local USE flags as opposed to global |
5 |
> > flags? Would they be acceptable to have IUSE defaults? |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Exactly the same way as global flags: drop an entry in the desktop |
9 |
> profile's package.use. |
10 |
|
11 |
I can understand the reasoning behind using this, but it seems |
12 |
unnecessarily laborious to do so - as I said, it would mean playing |
13 |
around with profiles whenever changing a package for which flags are |
14 |
defaulted. |
15 |
|
16 |
Perhaps some standardisation of what warrants an IUSE default could |
17 |
help, otherwise you might end up with the same situation, just relocated |
18 |
into the profiles namespace instead of the package. |
19 |
|
20 |
Having said that, I'm not strongly opposed, just trying to sound out |
21 |
pros/cons/gotcha's. |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Sam Jorna (wraeth) |
25 |
GnuPG Key: D6180C26 |