1 |
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) |
2 |
<hkBst@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> The benefit is being able to automatically reversion an ebuild. Reversioning may |
5 |
> not be necessary very often, but it's annoying when it is and there is no good |
6 |
> reason that it should. There is no benefit in keeping the version variables |
7 |
> read-only. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Marijn |
10 |
> |
11 |
|
12 |
I think that doing "PV=${PV/0./}" is asking for trouble, even if we |
13 |
had a function for reseting it after the change. In any case it should |
14 |
be a function like reset_pv ${PV/0./} which keeps other variables (P, |
15 |
S...) consistent. Also, this would imply an EAPI bump. |
16 |
|
17 |
I doubt this change is worth the trouble. |
18 |
|
19 |
Regards, |
20 |
-- |
21 |
Santiago M. Mola |
22 |
Jabber ID: cooldwind@×××××.com |
23 |
-- |
24 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |