| 1 |
Harald van D?k wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 03:25:31PM +0000, Steve Long wrote: |
| 3 |
>> > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
>> >> What kind of response do you think anyone else would have received had |
| 5 |
>> >> they started repeatedly attacking a project when they didn't even know |
| 6 |
>> >> what that project was, repeatedly tried to interfere with the |
| 7 |
>> >> management of a project when they don't know who is involved with or |
| 8 |
>> >> managing said project, repeatedly posted all kinds of outright lies |
| 9 |
>> >> after having been told that something was untrue and repeatedly |
| 10 |
>> >> resorted to ad hominem attacks in a technical discussion? |
| 11 |
>> >> |
| 12 |
>> Bloody hell where did all that come from? Am I missing something, cos I |
| 13 |
>> certainly haven't seen that on the dev m-l. Maybe it's a core/ irc thing, |
| 14 |
>> but afaic in the public domain drobbins hasn't done the above. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> drobbins has repeatedly claimed that PMS is not a Gentoo project, that |
| 17 |
> Ciaran is leading PMS, that Ciaran's involvement with PMS requires |
| 18 |
> developer status, that Gentoo projects require Gentoo copyright, and |
| 19 |
> more. Having read some of his past and later messages, I don't doubt his |
| 20 |
> intentions are good, but from this thread alone I initially got the same |
| 21 |
> impression Ciaran did, except I did not see any actual ad hominem's from |
| 22 |
> drobbins's side, myself. I did see Ciaran asking drobbins to stop with |
| 23 |
> them in reply to what he apparently considered one. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
OK my bad i read this thread first. I didn't see any outright lying etc |
| 26 |
although i guess the comments about ciaran's status can be seen as |
| 27 |
interference. Personally I've found drobbins' comments to be civil at |
| 28 |
least, even when he's clearly been wrong. (That top-posting tho, sheesh! ;) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
On a broader note, i thought this list was for all aspects of gentoo |
| 31 |
development, not just technical ones. Am i wrong about that? If so, sorry- |
| 32 |
where does the public discussion about non-technical issues happen? Have to |
| 33 |
say, that there's a lot of dev stuff that isn't technical, much to most |
| 34 |
coders' chagrin. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives