| 1 |
On Sunday 25 March 2007, Ioannis Aslanidis wrote: |
| 2 |
> I'd like to ask what are the negative side-effects of adding such |
| 3 |
> paragraph. Are there any true negative side-effects to a specification |
| 4 |
> like that? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> A different topic is the way the paragraph is written. If we don't |
| 7 |
> like how it is written, we can change it and problem solved. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
it isnt a different topic because as pointed out, it's very easy to skew the |
| 10 |
meaning to apply to anything and then screw ourselves |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
there's also the matter that if some more sponsors were to drop us, we'd then |
| 13 |
have to worry about our infrastructure being "evenly" spaced out among the |
| 14 |
remaining sponsors ... and then we could run into situations where sponsors |
| 15 |
offered more resources and we were forced to say no because our social |
| 16 |
contract was too restrictive |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
considering the pita this adds to address an issue that doesnt exist, seems |
| 19 |
like a no brainer to me: dont do it |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> To be honest, protecting ourselves from things that now seem |
| 22 |
> improbable, isn't such a bad idea. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
and where exactly do you stop ? |
| 25 |
-mike |
Archives