Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:18:41
Message-Id: 201110122018.03219.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild by "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn"
1 On Wednesday 12 October 2011 19:27:41 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
2 > Mike Frysinger schrieb:
3 > >> The removed qutecom ebuild was not broken at any time.
4 > >
5 > > by splitting my reply, you changed the meaning. having qutecom in the
6 > > tree with a depend on versions that i'm now removing breaks the
7 > > depgraph.
8 >
9 > The depgraph is broken after the old versions are removed, not before.
10
11 which is what i said
12 -mike

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies