| 1 |
Ühel kenal päeval, P, 11.08.2019 kell 14:53, kirjutas Michał Górny: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 2019-08-11 at 14:46 +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote: |
| 3 |
> > The USE flag naming feels a bit to be desired by me. |
| 4 |
> > That's because I don't believe in USE flags having to be named by |
| 5 |
> > the |
| 6 |
> > external dep they introduce, but by functionality. USE=magic sounds |
| 7 |
> > like a USE flag that adds some wizards into your application, |
| 8 |
> > automagic |
| 9 |
> > behavior or who knows (until you read the description). |
| 10 |
> > Not that I have a much better suggestion. USE=auto-mimetypes? |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> The use of term 'magic' for file type recognition by magic bytes is |
| 14 |
> well established. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Fair enough. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> Standing on your head and trying to invent an |
| 19 |
> alternative |
| 20 |
> is not going to help anyone, and only confuse people. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Completely uncalled for unfriendly hostile additional sentence. |
Archives