1 |
On Friday 02 September 2005 01:00 pm, Armando Di Cianno wrote: |
2 |
> On 2005-09-02 12:05:38 -0400 Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > On Friday 02 September 2005 11:50 am, Gustavo Zacarias wrote: |
4 |
> >> Mike Frysinger wrote: |
5 |
> >>> any known/standing issues people wish to get out before we move |
6 |
> >>> gcc-3.3.6 |
7 |
> >>> to x86 stable ? |
8 |
> >> |
9 |
> >> You'll also need a matching dev-libs/libffi, otherwise it'll go all |
10 |
> >> circular for people using GNUstep. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > toolchain doesnt maintain libffi, the gnustep peeps do ... |
13 |
> |
14 |
> The gnustep herd (me) isn't going to be able to do much until the |
15 |
> weekend...hey, the weekend starts in about 4 hours for me ... |
16 |
|
17 |
i'm not exactly in a rush to make this happen, so i dont mind waiting for you |
18 |
to get libffi sorted (assuming it wont take like a month :P) |
19 |
|
20 |
> I've been trying to phase out dev-libs/libffi for a long while...if |
21 |
> someone can figure out a patch for gcc-3.3 series that compiles and |
22 |
> installs libffi w/o building the entirety of gjc/java/etc, that would |
23 |
> be fantastic; gcc-3.4 series has had this for a long time, and the |
24 |
> patch is incredibly simple -- my one attempt at doing this for gcc-3.3 |
25 |
> series proved fruitless. (The little bit of monkeying I've done with |
26 |
> gcc-4 series has proved easy wrt to this.) |
27 |
|
28 |
so has this all been integrated into the gcc ebuilds or does it need to be |
29 |
or ... ? |
30 |
-mike |
31 |
-- |
32 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |