Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
To: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 14:46:02
Message-Id: CAAr7Pr-fLGPCjtpNaWEbnfBwXBjq9mxbdJ65vQjk4_DsVYNjvg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4 by Joonas Niilola
1 On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 8:18 AM Joonas Niilola <juippis@×××××.com> wrote:
2
3 > On 10/27/18 2:16 PM, Michal Prívozník wrote:
4 > >
5 > > That is the case on every mailing list. Every -dev list has number of
6 > > subscribes far bigger than number of people with commit access.
7 > >
8 > > But I respect your decision guys. I am going to stop posting patches
9 > > until there's an agreement on how to do that.
10 > >
11 > > Michal
12 > >
13 >
14 > Why can't you use Github like _everyone_ else? It's really simple and fast.
15 >
16
17 I don't appreciate this type of argumentation. _everyone_ else doesn't use
18 Github. Some people use it.
19 Why doesn't Gentoo just use binary packages like _everyone_else; the answer
20 is because Gentoo values building from source and we
21 also value controlling our own destiny by running our own tooling.
22
23
24 >
25 > Also, as I see, tamiko has been applying all of your (recent) patches,
26 > so maybe you can ask him to become your personal committer (/ proxied
27 > maintainer), and send patches via PM so everyone stays happy? :)
28 >
29
30 I'm happy to see patches on the list; I'd rather have too much email on the
31 list then not enough.
32
33 -A